“‘Whenever you have a culture in which it’s accepted that sexual activity as has been described is part of that culture — i.e. using local prostitutes — that is not going to be a culture in which women are going to be want to be in,’ said Milgram, who has advised law enforcement agencies on recruiting and retaining women. ‘Those are generally not cultures that want to have women.'”
Would the active recruitment of women to the Secret Service make the Secret Service less sexist, or would a less sexist Secret Service attract more women? While I think this article is blatantly capitalizing on scandal to make a point about Secret Service recruiting tactics, it’s also missing a critical component to changing organizational culture, particularly security organizations, which have remained largely immune to social change, and apparently, still retain a number of agents who believe women are unwilling to live the jet-set life outlined in this article, making them utterly incapable of adapting to the Service’s organizational culture — which, after reading this article, makes me think this culture is more an enclave, and agents utterly ignorant to the growing numbers of women entering the security field.
Recruiting strategies may have changed since the 1970s, but getting women into the organization is only half the battle. Keeping them is the real struggle, and unfortunately, this article falls short in detailing how mentorship and specialization can and should be used to counteract pervasive sexism in organizations reticent to admit to their entrenched “boys club” attitude.
Article: Secret Service prostitute scandal highlights lack of women in agency (U.S. News – MSNBC)